Atlas species information
Introduction
Detailed species information from your search of the Atlas. Note that this information is longer maintained. Information may be out of date and images may not display.- Scientific name:
- Leiopelma archeyi
- Common name:
- Archey's frog
- Naming authority:
- Turbott, 1942
- Bio status category:
- Indigenous (Endemic)
- IUCN threat status:
- Critically Endangered
- NZ threat classification:
- Nationally Vulnerable
Refer to www.doc.govt.nz/nztcs for NZ threat classification system details.
Archey's frog
Habitat
- Moist native forest, grassy clearings and sub-alpine scrub at 200-1000 m altitude.
- Often occurs on mist-shrouded ridges away from creeks.
- Nocturnal.
- Eggs layed on damp soil beneath rocks or logs and guarded by male; development terrestrial, tadpoles and froglets may cling to males back until metamorphosis completed.
Description
- Light fawn to dark brown, sometimes with dull to bright green patches, or occassionally green all over.
- Varying amounts of dark blotching.
- No bright markings on thighs.
- Measures up to 38 mm from snout tip to vent.
- The skin is generally smooth, though some scattered tubercles (small knob-like projections on the skin) occur on the proximal (upper) portions of the thighs and shanks, and some individuals are more warty on their backs than others.
Distribution
- Moehau and Colville Ranges on the Coromandel Peninsula south to ranges near Paeroa.
- Whareorino Forest, west of Te Kuiti.
Notes
- Named after Sir Gilbert Archey (1890-1974), former Director of the Auckland Institute and Museum.
- Subfossil bones attributable to the Leiopelma hamiltoni species complex have been found in the Waitomo, Hawke's Bay, Wairarapa and north-west Nelson, suggesting that some or all of the members of this group were formerly more widely distributed.
- Notes about NZ threat classification (Hitchmough 2002): Probable impact of chytrid fungal disease.
- Notes about 2008-10 cycle of NZ threat classification for Frogs (Newman et al 2010): Qualifier 'De' because of past catastrophic decline (~85%) in Coromandel; population now persisting at severely reduced level, but no observed recovery although recruitment observed since crash, at least two potential agents of decline present - rodents and chytrid fungus, vulnerable because of slow maturity and long generation time (3 generations estimated at 30-45 years), no island populations, stable (+/- 20%), Whareorino sub-population is a small proportion (<10%) of the total population, qualifier 'CD' - predator control and disease spread management, ongoing monitoring critical.
- Notes about 2012-14 cycle of NZ threat classification for Frogs: (Newman, et al.
- 2013): Ongoing chytrid infection, population stabilised but no recovery detected.
- Rat impacts at population level confirmed - declines where rats not controlled in Whareorino.
- Threats from proposed mining activity.
- Mining prospecting leading to extensions of known range.
- Early signs of establishment with recruitment at Pureora translocation site.
Statistical information and distribution map
| Before 1988 | Since 1988 | |
|---|---|---|
| Live Specimen | 243 | 1313 |
| Dead Specimen | 1 | 4 |
| Bone | 8 | 1 |
| Total | 252 | 1318 |
Live or dead specimen or shed skin
Bone or fossil