South-East Marine Protection Forum
Get the recommendations report and find out more about the work of the South-East Marine Protection Forum.
The proposed network
The Minister of Conservation and Minister of Fisheries have agreed to progress Network 1 as set out in the Forum’s recommendations report because it best meets the objectives of the Marine Protected Areas Policy (PDF, 809K).
Ministers believe this option will create the best protection for important habitats found in the South Island’s south-eastern coastal area including foraging areas for marine mammals, birds, fish and invertebrates.
DOC and Fisheries New Zealand will now work to progress the proposed network under the Fisheries Act (1996) and the Marine Reserves Act (1971).
The Marine Reserves Act requires public notification of an application for an Order in Council (OIC) to declare a marine reserve. The Department of Conservation will prepare the application for an OIC based on the Forum’s Recommendations Report. The Fisheries Act requires public consultation as part of its process.
DOC and Fisheries New Zealand will undertake consultation with tangata whenua, stakeholders and the public.
Agencies will also continue to work with Kāi Tahu to explore their aspirations for establishing and managing Marine Protected Areas in the region. This includes what co-management of the proposed Marine Protected Areas will look like.
- Recommendations report (PDF, 17,879K)
- Map of Network 1 (PDF, 1,149K)
- Paper from Ministers of Conservation and Fisheries to Cabinet Environment, Energy and Climate Committee 14 March 2019 (PDF, 212K)
- Minute of Cabinet Environment, Energy and Climate Committee 14 March 2019 (PDF, 115K)
The next step towards establishing a network of Marine Protected Areas on the South Island’s south-east coast is public consultation.
While the South-East Marine Protection Forum consulted widely before making their recommendations, the public has not been consulted on the network in its current form.
Ministers want to ensure they have a good understanding of public perspectives on the proposed network before making a final decision.
DOC and the Fisheries New Zealand are currently working on establishing a process for public consultation that will involve tangata whenua, the community and stakeholders.
We will provide more information on the consultation process when it is available.
Advice to Ministers
DOC and Fisheries New Zealand had a role to help Ministers understand the implications of the two recommendations put forward by the Forum, and therefore make well informed decisions.
The following documents were provided to Ministers:
- Joint (DOC and Fisheries New Zealand) advice to the Ministers on the Forum’s recommendations (PDF, 7,249K)
- Agenda for meeting with Minister of Fisheries IPDF, 549K)
- Network summary (PDF, 357K)
- Implementation options (PDF, 464K)
Note: this document appears blank as it is being withheld under the Official Information Act while Ministers make decisions, but is listed here for the sake of transparency. Once the decisions are made we will release it.
DOC-only advice to Minister of Conservation:
- Memo with additional information to the Minister of Conservation only (PDF, 529K)
- Memo to Minister of Conservation for meeting with Minister of Fisheries (PDF, 571K)
- Key points for meeting with Minister of Fisheries (PDF, 114K)
Fisheries New Zealand-only advice to Minister of Fisheries:
Note that some information is currently withheld from these documents under the Official Information Act due to:
- personal contact details of officials, under section 9(2)(a) – to protect the privacy of natural persons, including deceased people
- advice still under consideration, section 9(2)(f)(iv) – to maintain the current constitutional conventions protecting the confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministers and officials.
Lessons learned report
An independent lessons learned analysis of the South-East Marine Protection Forum process was commissioned by DOC and undertaken by the Caravel Group. The analysis considered the positive and negative aspects of governing, planning, controlling and delivering the project. The report incorporates feedback from the Forum members, the project Governance Group, and the SEMPF project team. It does not, and wasn’t intended to, make any judgements on the outcome of the SEMP Forum.
The report’s authors found that overall the Forum process held together well; that all participants had good intent to meet the objectives, and the Forum Chair did a great job bringing differing views together, aiming for consensus. It also identified a number of elements that could be improved, including more clearly defined marine policy and agency roles, and more time should have been spent planning and providing information before the forum began its work.
Lessons learned from this report will be incredibly helpful in future work to design improved and more streamlined processes for protecting our significant marine areas.
Viewing files on this page
If you can't view these files contact us to request another format. About our files.