Appendix 4: Tracking outcome and intermediate outcome indicators
This appendix tracks the Department's progress in developing and reporting on the outcome and intermediate outcome indicators identified in its statements of intent. Further information on the indicators is contained in section 3.0 of the main document.
The chart is organised according to the outcome and intermediate outcomes used in this Statement of Intent. In a number of cases the indicators are continued on from the outcomes and intermediate outcomes used in previous statements of intent. In other cases, indicators have been discontinued because they no longer fit with the intentions of the new intermediate outcome. The chart also shows indicators that have been discontinued because they were not sufficiently robust.
Developing indicators is ongoing work and subject to further refinement each year.
Outcome: Conserving and managing New Zealand's natural, historic and cultural heritage provides increasing benefit to New Zealanders
|
Outcome indicators
|
AR 2005-2006
|
AR 2006-2007
|
AR 2007-2008
|
AR 2008-2009
|
AR 2009-2010
|
|
Change in native vegetation cover across New Zealand as a whole by environment type and level of protection.
First developed as an indicator of the previous 'protection' outcome.
|
1st reported. Uses Land Environments of New Zealand (LENZ) database.
|
|
|
2nd report due. Trend in percentage cover of native vegetation. Thereafter reported every five years.
|
|
|
Track trends in benefits New Zealanders seek and receive from the natural, historic, and cultural heritage managed by the Department.
This was first developed as an indicator of the Department's 'appreciation outcome': "People enjoy and benefit from New Zealand's natural, historic and cultural heritage and are connected with conservation." It has been kept as an indicator of the Department's single outcome. It will be subject to further development as the move to the single outcome is further integrated into the planning system.
|
Tools developed and applied. 1st reported.
|
|
2nd report due. Trends in how New Zealanders seek and receive benefits from their heritage. To be reported on every three years.
Next report due in Annual Report to June 2011.
|
|
|
|
Track relative value of conservation as indicator of support for conservation.
This indicator was first developed for the 'appreciation outcome', and further developed through the values survey commissioned by the Department in 2006 - 2007. It will be subject to further development as the move to the single outcome is further integrated into the planning system.
|
|
1st reported. Baseline study completed. Conservation values monitor trial begun.
|
2nd report due. (Conservation values monitor trial report).
|
|
3rd report due. Planned to cover trend in how New Zealanders value conservation relative to other values.
|
back to top
Intermediate outcome 1: The ecological integrity of managed sites is maintained or restored
|
Indicators
|
AR 2005-2006
|
AR 2006-2007
|
AR 2007-2008
|
AR 2008-2009
|
AR 2009-2010
|
|
Change in indigenous vegetation cover on conservation land by environment type.
First developed as an indicator of the 'natural character' intermediate outcome.
|
1st reported. Uses New Zealand Land Cover Database (LCDB).
|
Ministry for the Environment began updating LCDB.
|
|
2nd report due, supported by the updated LCDB.
|
|
|
Change in size-class structure of selected indigenous dominants in particular places within forests on conservation land.
First developed as an indicator for the previous 'natural character' intermediate outcome.
|
1st reported. Focused on two contributing indicators: size-class structure, and representation of specific species or functional groups.
|
Contributing indicator group expanded from two to five indicators, under a three-year work programme.
|
|
Three-year work programme on contributory indicators due for completion.
Next report due in Annual Report to June 2011.
|
|
|
Monitoring the status of, and trends in the condition of, the marine reserves managed by the Department.
This indicator is part of an ongoing programme of monitoring marine reserves. It is being further developed to improve national consistency.
|
|
|
Indicator developed. Reports to be provided on an annual basis on selected aspects of the reserves.
|
1st report due.
|
2nd report due.
|
|
Increase in biosecurity and/or pest management responses by Biosecurity New Zealand to incursions/pests adversely affecting conservation values, as a direct response to the Department's biosecurity advice and advocacy.
First developed as an indicator of the previous 'harmful organisms' intermediate outcome.
|
1st reported.
|
2nd report.
|
3rd report due.
|
4th report due.
|
5th report due.
|
back to top
Intermediate outcome 2: The security of threatened species unique to New Zealand, and most at risk of extinction, is improved
|
Indicators
|
AR 2005-2006
|
AR 2006-2007
|
AR 2007-2008
|
AR 2008-2009
|
AR 2009-2010
|
|
Change in the number of extinct species or subspecies (both confirmed and assumed extinctions).
First developed as an indicator of the previous 'risk of extinction' intermediate outcome.
|
Threat classification system prepared in 2001. Species list was reassessed in 2004. 1st reported in the Annual Report to June 2004.
|
Review of Threat Classification System methodology completed. Move to three-yearly cycle of reviewing one taxonomic group at a time.
|
Three-year cycle of reviewing one taxonomic group at a time begins.
|
Taxonomic groupings review continues.
|
Taxonomic groupings review continues.
Projected date of next report is June 2011 once all groups have been reviewed.
|
|
Change in the threat classification status of managed 'acutely threatened', 'chronically threatened' and 'at risk' species or subspecies.
First developed as an indicator of the previous 'risk of extinction' intermediate outcome.
|
Last reported in the Annual Report to June 2004.
|
|
2nd report due.
Three-year re-listing cycle using updated methodology begins.
|
|
Projected date of next report.
|
back to top
Intermediate outcome 3: Examples of the full range of New Zealand's ecosystems are conserved
|
Indicators
|
AR 2005-2006
|
AR 2006-2007
|
AR 2007-2008
|
AR 2008-2009
|
AR 2009-2010
|
|
Trends in the percentage of the most at risk environment types (freshwater and terrestrial) under legal protection from year to year.
First developed as an indicator of the previous 'representative range' intermediate outcome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of lowland forest areas in protection.
|
1st reported. Baseline data established.
|
2nd report. Trends in the percentage of the most at risk environment types under legal protection from year to year (using underlying LENZ data), with the least represented types clearly identified.
|
3rd report due.
|
4th report due.
|
5th report due.
|
|
Percentage of wetland areas in protection
|
|
|
1st report due.
|
|
|
|
Progress of regional planning forums to implement the Marine Protected Areas Policy to establish a network of Marine Protected Areas that is comprehensive and representative of New Zealand's marine habitats and ecosystems.
|
|
|
Indicator developed following Government approval of Marine Protected Areas: Classification, Protection Standards and Implementation Guidelines Ministry of Fisheries and Department of Conservation, 2008.
|
1st report due. Thereafter three yearly reporting cycle.
|
|
back to top
Intermediate outcome 5: New Zealanders increasingly engage in conversation
|
Indicators
|
AR 2005-2006
|
AR 2006-2007
|
AR 2007-2008
|
AR 2008-2009
|
AR 2009-2010
|
|
Change in New Zealanders' understanding of important conservation issues.
First developed as an indicator of the previous 'awareness and understanding' intermediate outcome.
|
1st reported. Baseline data established.
|
2nd report.
|
3rd report due. Trend in New Zealanders' understanding of important conservation issues.
|
4th report due.
|
5th report due.
|
|
Change in the quality of the Department's engagement with key associates.
First developed as an indicator of the previous 'awareness and understanding' intermediate outcome.
|
1st reported. Baseline data established.
|
2nd report.
|
3rd report due. Trend in quality of the Department's engagement with key associates.
|
4th report due.
|
5th report due.
|
|
Change in the satisfaction of tangata whenua with the Department's activities to assist them to maintain their cultural relationships with taonga.
First developed as an indicator of the previous 'awareness and understanding' intermediate outcome.
|
1st reported. Baseline data established.
|
2nd report.
|
3rd report due. Trend in tangata whenua's satisfaction with the Department's activities to assist them to maintain their cultural relationships with taonga.
|
4th report due.
|
5th report due.
|
back to top
Intermediate outcome 6: New Zealanders have increased opportunities for recreation and outdoor activities
|
Indicators
|
AR 2005-2006
|
AR 2006-2007
|
AR 2007-2008
|
AR 2008-2009
|
AR 2009-2010
|
|
Change over time in New Zealanders' participation in recreation on public conservation land and their satisfaction with the quality and range of recreational opportunities provided.
Expansion of previous indicator of 'recreation' intermediate outcome.
|
2nd report on original indicator "Change over time in visitor satisfaction with the range of recreation opportunities provided."
|
Indicator expanded to include satisfaction with quality of opportunities.
|
3rd report due on expanded indicator.
|
|
4th report due.
|
Intermediate outcome 7: Business opportunities consistent with conservation outcomes are enabled
|
Intermediate outcome 7: Business opportunities consistent with conservation outcomes are enabled
|
|
Indicators
|
AR 2005-2006
|
AR 2006-2007
|
AR 2007-2008
|
AR 2008-2009
|
AR 2009-2010
|
|
Indicators to be developed for this outcome during 2008-2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
back to top
Indicators discontinued in 2008-2009 due to change in outcome and intermediate outcomes
|
|
AR 2005-2006
|
AR 2006-2007
|
2007-2008
|
AR 2008-2009
|
|
Indicator for the previous 'protection' outcome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in New Zealanders' views on the change in condition of the country's natural heritage, and how they believe the Department has influenced this change.
|
1st reported. Baseline data established. Uses focus groups.
|
|
2nd report due. Trend in New Zealanders' views on condition - whether improving, stable or declining, and whether protection has increased.
|
Discontinued as a reporting indicator.
|
|
Indicators for previous 'awareness and understanding' intermediate outcome
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in people's satisfaction with their involvement in conservation.
|
1st reported. Baseline data established.
|
2nd report.
|
3rd report due. Trend in people's satisfaction with their involvement in conservation.
|
Discontinued as a reporting indicator.
|
|
Change in the percentage of people involved in conservation projects in general and on conservation land.
|
1st reported. Baseline data established.
|
2nd report.
|
3rd report due. Trend in percentage of people involved in conservation projects in general and on conservation land.
|
Discontinued as a reporting indicator.
|
|
Change in the percentage of departmental information sources New Zealanders use to learn about conservation.
|
1st reported. Baseline data established.
|
2nd report.
|
3rd report due. Trend in percentage of departmental information sources New Zealanders use to learn about conservation.
|
Discontinued as a reporting indicator.
|
back to top
Indicators discontinued because they were not sufficiently robust to continue
|
|
AR 2005-2006
|
AR 2006-2007
|
2007-2008
|
AR 2008-2009
|
|
Indicators for previous 'awareness and understanding' intermediate outcome
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in recognition of the role of Crown pastoral leases in providing ecosystem services.
|
1st reported. Indicator disestablished as not sufficiently robust to continue.
|
|
Indicator to be re-developed.
|
|
|
Indicators of previous 'representative range' intermediate outcome
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of most at risk marine areas in protection.
|
1st reported. Baseline data established.
|
2nd report. Trends in the percentage of the most at risk environment types under legal protection from year to year, with the least represented types clearly identified.
|
3rd report due.
|
Indicator discontinued because it was not sufficiently focused on the needs of marine protection. An annual figure for the area (hectares) of legally protected marine areas is provided through the output measure - "legal protection of areas and sites: marine protection".
|
|
Tracking the impact of the Department's efforts to encourage or require others to protect places and species.
|
1st reported. Disestablished as a formal indicator due to tracking and quantification difficulties. Development of a prototype database to track RMA work begun.
|
Continued development of prototype database to track RMA work.
|
Discontinued as a reporting indicator.
|
|
|
Indicator of previous 'concessions' intermediate outcome
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change over time in number of significant adverse effects that stem from business concession activities.
|
1st reported. Methodologies to monitor visitor impacts under development.
|
2nd report.
|
3rd report due.
|
Discontinued as a reporting indicator because of the difficulty of reporting this information, and because it does not adequately reflect the intentions of the new intermediate outcome.
|
back to top